Call us at

Rome 2 No Trade Agreements

Perhaps the most important factor that AI uses is an unfortunate game difficulty. If the difficulty is above normal, the AI will only act with you on the most favourable terms and will refuse trade relations for no particular reason. If you play with a more difficult difficulty, this could be your problem. Trade can take place between two political groups in campaign mode. Trade agreements can be concluded on the diplomatic screen, allowing political groups to exchange trade resources and generate additional revenue for both factions. Note: The Tomb Kings are the only faction that actually uses resources for their mortuary cult mechanics (Edit: a similar mechanic called forgery has been added to the dwarves in Warhammer 2 only since this response was originally published). For all other groups, resources only increase the value of trade agreements. So you`re generally right to think that these resources are not actually used by the trading partner, but not in this particular example. I have never seen evidence that more commercial resources would increase the likelihood of someone agreeing to a trade agreement. The diplomatic system is very veiled here. I have seen that groups with 200-plus relationships are opposed to profitable trade for them and that groups with 5-strong relationships accept the same trade. Some groups really like me and a trade route is possible, but they always and again refuse to trade with me – and other groups are neutral towards me, but are happy to agree with a trade agreement.

Can anyone explain the game mechanic`s explanations by which the AI decides whether to accept or reject a proposed trade agreement? Animal men, greenskin and chaos warriors cannot act. On the left (on your side), the interface shows you how much you earn with the trade and resources you export to your trading partner. The right side shows how much money they earn and what resources you import from them. The more resources you have, the more likely it is that this group will sign the treaty. More importantly, it indicates that the other party is benefiting from the fact that I have more resources. Trade can only be concluded between two groups if their capitals are connected by roads or waterways, and usually only if relations are good. Roads on land cannot cross the territory of another group. It seems strange to me, I should be the beneficiary who has more means. Imagine this: “I make so much money to export this and this.” So, in your example, you will receive 620 golds per train and no resources, while Arkhan will receive 110 gold and all those resources on your side.